ABSTRACT
The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infections around the world has prompted scientists to explore different approaches to develop therapeutics against COVID-19. This study focused on investigating the mechanism of inhibition of clioquinol (CLQ) and its derivatives (7-bromo-5-chloro-8-hydroxyquinoline (CLBQ), 5, 7-Dichloro-8-hydroxyquinoline (CLCQ)) against the viral glycoprotein, and human angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (hACE-2) involved in SARS-CoV-2 entry. The drugs were docked at the exopeptidase site of hACE-2 and receptor binding domain (RBD) sites of SARS-CoV-2 Sgp to calculate the binding affinity of the drugs. To understand and establish the inhibitory characteristics of the drugs, molecular dynamic (MD) simulation of the best fit docking complex performed. Evaluation of the binding energies of the drugs to hACE-2 after 100 ns MD simulations revealed CLQ to have the highest binding energy value of -40.4 kcal/mol close to MLN-7640 (-45.4 kcal/mol), and higher than the exhibited values for its derivatives: CLBQ (-34.5 kcal/mol) and CLCQ (-24.8 kcal/mol). This suggests that CLQ and CLBQ bind more strongly at the exopeptidase site than CLCQ. Nevertheless, the evaluation of binding affinity of the drugs to SARS-CoV-2 Sgp showed the drugs are weakly bound at the RBD site, with CLBQ, CLCQ, CLQ exhibiting relatively low energy values of -16.8 kcal/mol, -16.34 kcal/mol, -12.5 kcal/mol, respectively compared to the reference drug, Bisoxatin (BSX), with a value of -25.8 kcal/mol. The structural analysis further suggests decrease in systems stability and explain the mechanism of inhibition of clioquinol against SARS-CoV-2 as reported in previous in vitro study.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.
ABSTRACT
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, formerly known as 2019 novel coronavirus, the causative pathogen of coronavirus disease 2019 is a major source of disaster in the 21st century. In the second meeting of the Emergency Committee, the World Health Organization declared that coronavirus disease 2019 is a "public-health emergency of international concern" on 30 January, 2020. Coronavirus is transmitted via airborne droplets from human to human or human to animal. Through membrane angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 exopeptidase receptor coronavirus enters in human cell. For the treatment of this sudden and lethal disease during coronavirus disease 2019, there are no specific anti-virus drugs or vaccines. Still, the development of these medicines will take months, even years. Currently there is need of supportive care and non-specific treatment to improve the symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 infected patient. For this specific indication, rapid performance of herbal medicine or phytochemicals can contribute as an alternative measure. Phytochemicals are a powerful group of chemicals that are derived from plants origin hence causing fewer side effects because of less use of additives, preservatives or excipients. Hence, this review will focus on some phytochemicals which may control and prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Further, the existing healing options, drugs accessible, ongoing trials and current diagnostics to treat severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 have been discussed. We suggested phytochemicals extracted from herbal plants are potential novel therapeutic approaches, completely targeting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and its pathways.
ABSTRACT
The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus2 (SARS-CoV2) is responsible for Corona Virus Disease 2019 (CoViD-19), the pandemic that has afflicted close to two million people worldwide, and has taken the lives of over 120,000 patients since its first report in late December 2019. Per million people globally, the infection rate is close to 250 with a death rate of close to 14 (death rate average global death rate: 6.06%; for comparison, revised estimate of the 1918 influenza pandemic had an average global death rate of 5.4% [1]). About 400,000 SARS-CoV2-positive patients have been declared 'recovered', although it is not clear to date what exactly that entails. To be clear, the natural history of SARS-CoV2 infection and of the patho-physiology of CoViD-19 remains shrouded in relative confusion, in part due to the exceedingly virulent nature of the virus, as manifest by its elevated morbidity and mortality, and the fast accumulation of clinical observations and research evidence. Many pieces of a complex puzzle are emerging all at once and their organization into a coherent and cogent picture of the natural history of CoViD-19 is arduous and still wanting. Here, we discuss the recent findings in the context of the available evidence. We propose a putative prediction model of the natural history of CoViD-19. We highlight putative loci and modes of therapeutic intervention that may become beneficial preventive and treatment modalities for individuals at risk of SARS-CoV2 infection and CoViD-19 patients.